Viser opslag med etiketten English. Vis alle opslag
Viser opslag med etiketten English. Vis alle opslag

tirsdag den 6. marts 2012

Instructions on how to Become a Wine Connoisseur in 25 Minutes.

We at Gastropean are proud to present such a prominent guest blogger as A.S. Trindberg, the renowned Swedish wine expert. Since his breakthrough with the masterwork The Red Wine Room, which founded The Modern Wine Breakthrough in the 80'es, Mr. Trindberg has stood as one of our times' most prominent authorities within the noble art of wine tasting.

Instructions on how to Become a Wine Connoisseur in 25 Minutes.

By A. S. Trindberg

Preface

Everybody is free to buy wine and to have whatever opinion about it that he wants. No doubt about that. It must be recognized however that some opinions are more popular than others. At dinner parties in restaurants or private homes, on festive occasions or simply at wine tastings (where this pamphlet really justifies its existence), everybody can gorge himself with outstanding wines, if he has the financial means, but for quite a large part of the population, this is far from enough. What's important is not only to enjoy the wine, but to talk about the wine. Without a specifically coded satisfactory analysis and description of the wine, it cannot be considered as properly consumed. This analysis and description can only be made by a true wine connoisseur. To become one takes years of hard work and a considerable amount of self-glorification. Fortunately it is not difficult to pick up the trick, and with this pamphlet in his hand, every reasonably sensible human being should be able to bluff his way through as a connoisseur after approximately 25 minutes of studying.

Background

Here I betray the ideal for the true wine connoisseur, who will claim that the ability to stand out as a connoisseur can only be achieved through a laborious and long-standing preoccupation. The truth is that nothing is easier than being a wine connoisseur. Where the uninitiated everyday wine drinker (and ugh, if there's anything a connoisseur despites, it's people that simply drink wine) e.g. would say that a given wine 'is really tasty', a connoisseur would never descend to that level. Having sniffed, gargled, in- and exhaled a couple of times, he'll frown and mumble a thoughtful 'hem hmmm'. If he really likes the wine, it'll soon be followed by a rather bland 'interesting'. Where the winedrinker only expressed a feeling: that he found the wine tasty, the connoisseur will never condescend to mere feelings; his judgement is less shallow, his analysis is professionally based and his knowledge and wisdom is clearly infinite. What matters for the connoisseur is not simply aesthetic pleasure, but his own judgement and consequently other people's lack of judgement and mental faculties. The art of being a wine connoisseur rests on a basic knowledge of professional terms, a considerable amount of self-overestimation and a certain degree of flexibility. The true connoisseur is never wrong, and for that reason he must always be careful not to be in a position where his judgement can be questioned. In front of laymen the wine connoisseur will put on a technical and professional attitude to show his superiority and outdo them with his knowledge, but in front of professionals he will side with the ordinary wine drinker and impose his hobby horses based on a merely aestethic attitude. Thus the connoisseur is always on safe ground and almighty in his own perfection.

Preliminary Excercises

A wine connoisseur should never be categorical in his opinions; this can be taken as less serious, and furthermore it represents a considerable risk. A wine connoisseur can sniff his glass for hours. This gives the impression of immersion and postpones the moment where others might force a proper opinion from him.

If the connoisser feels obliged to put forward a proper value judgment – which should generally be avoided - he must of course stress the fact that it's only a provisional observation, and then express himself in words that only with difficulty – if at all – can be connected to reality. An example: For a wine at this level, it expresses some reflection, if not actual nobleness, then at least a quest for a certain verticality. Or: The viscosity and the fruit of the wine may not be in balance, but perhaps it is only the stage at which we have seized the wine? Wast thou much enligtened by this? No, but such speaking leaves anyone out. The ignorant are impressed, the experts can't find the energy to contradict or to ask questions. The result is that he who comes up with such things stands unchallenged and as a genuine Connaisseur!

Style

A piece of good advice for the starting wine connoisseur is to find a specific style, a technical expression or a specific angle to apply to all wines. For instance you may remember always to ask if the wine has been through bâtonnage, pichage or whatever. Whether it's possible or not to give a reasonable answer to the question, the connoisseur can put up a pensive and know-all attitude and just say, 'hemmm' or 'ahh'. You only have to find your own detail to ask about. Possible counter questions and follow-ups can always be averted just by sticking your nose deep in the glass, looking very concentrated. (In fact, this goes for all precarious situations). As you meet the same people more than once with the same question, they'll start to believe that you have understood something that no one else can grasp; that you have a special insight into wine linked to bâtonnage for example. Most technical terms will work here.

Vocabulary

A

Academic

If you are out of your depth in the discussion of a given wine, or of wine in general, you can always play the 'Now, don't let us get too academic'-card. By this you signal that you know better, but that none of those present would be capable of fully understanding even if if you tried to explain.

Ambiguous judgements

In a way the pinnacle of a wine connoisseur's style. Should not be used too much in discussions of wine. Examples: 'The wine has a spontaneous fruit, which is in sharp contrast to its complicated structure.' Or: 'The structure of the wine signifies an almost innate contradiction.' Or: 'The fruitiness is almost overwhelming, but at the same time not particularly prevailing.' (!)

Autolysis

A concept to be used with a certain prudence, as it has a real meaning - generally in connection with champagne. Yet practically no one understands the real meaning, which makes the concept quite usable in most situations! Should you be asked directly about the meaning, you can just sigh and tell the questioner that it is a rather complicated process that takes place in the enzymes of the wine. (And since less than one quarter of one percent of the world population know what enzymes actually are, this is normally rather safe ground).

B

Balance

Refers to the balance between the various elements of the wines: acidity, sweetness, tannin, etc. Every wine connoisseur's most important tool. In most circles it's perfectly legitimate to say things like: 'To me the most important thing in a wine is balance'. With that you suggest that you taste wine at a different level than others, and at the same time it is impossible to contradict (who would claim that they prefer an unbalanced wine?)

Banal

A perfect word to show disrespect for a wine without actually saying anything concrete. Works whether it's a grand cru or an item on sale from the supermarket.

Brett

Short for brettomycanes. A specific type of wild yeast that gives a somewhat rustic barn-like smell. The smell is quite common in very traditional wines, contrary to the term, which is unknown to most people. It has a concrete meaning and should therefore be used cautiously.

C

Caricature

Definitely too characteristic. Should only be used if you are on really safe ground.

Centripetal

'The energy of the wine has an almost centripetal character'. Plain nonsense; a charateristic that should be used cautiously.

Characteristic

Good expression when on the one hand you think that the wine is not totally ordinary, but on the other not being really sure whether you like it or not.

Charming

Suggests that a wine tastes or smells good, but really isn't worth anything.

Choleric

It is always nice to connect the character of the wine with a categorization of humans which only very few people are familiar with. See also: Elegiac, Phlegmatic and Sanguine.

Cold climate wine

A rather incoherent term for wines made in a relatively cold climate. Probably an attempt to bring wines from e.g. Canada and New Zealand into the fine company of e.g. Burgundy and Champagne.

Colour

The colour of the wine is usually a part of the judgement criteria, but one can easily avoid disputable expressions, for instance by pointing to the 'hard' or 'crystaline' colour of the wine.

Complex

An exemplary expression that can be used about the greatest wines as well as some nasty mistakes. Complex. What does it mean? Well, that requires a complex answer.

Correct

Means that the wine doesn't have any faults, but that the wine connoisseur finds it most boring.

D

Demonic

Should be used seldom and with caution, but is completely incomprehensible and can often make a hit in sentences as: 'On the face of it, the wine is quite straightforward, but it has something demonic to it'.

E

Elegiac

It is always nice to connect the character of the wine with a categorization of humans which only very few people are familiar with. See also: Choleric, Phlegmatic and Sanguine.

F

Fault

When there's something really wrong with the wine (not just that you don't like it). Should be used with caution whenever there's anyone present with a technical knowledge of wine; in other situations) you can easily give it away.

Flaw

When there's something wrong with the wine that is not bad enough to be a fault (see above).

G

Great

The adjective 'great' is reserved simply for the best wines, and you should use the expression with caution. Luckily it can be modified in many ways so that you can differentiate between 'great' and 'good'. In this way a wine can be great even if you don't really like it. The word can be used if you have judged a very expensive wine as rather poor. 'Sure, it's a great wine, but I don't find it quite balanced at this stage'.

H

Hem

Should never be be used as an answer to questions, where it can be perceived as uncertain and hesitant, but much rather in combination with an inward-looking attitude and thoughtful expression, where it will indicate profundity and a deeper and more complex understanding of the wine than other people possess.

I

Interesting

Excellent expression that can be used in most difficult situations, should you be forced to make a proper judgement of a wine, or if you are so unlucky that it is your father-in-law, or perhaps the winegrower himself, who has served something tasting like ancient bark or a boiled pencil case. ('What do I think? Well, yes, interesting - really interesting!')

L

Lactic

A concrete term for tastes in wine, but sufficiently difficult to define, so that most people just let it pass, no matter how the wine tastes.

Lalala

An umbrella term for three renowned wines from Côte-Rôtie in the othern Rhône Valley. A way, so to speak, to be on familiar terms with wines that cost several hundreds of Euros a bottle. Whether you have tasted these three La's or not, it will compel most people's respect, if you claim that a given Rhône wine is not on a level with the Lalala's from the old days. (For a Connoisseur with a certain routine, every famous wine was much better 'in the old days'.)

M

Maceration

An essential part of the process of making red wines. Very important for the expression of the wine, but only a few know much about how it affects the finished wine. It is obvious to refer to difficulties during the maceration or the like, if you want to express a slightly hidden disapproval.

Maceration carbonique

Technique to create particularly light and fruity red wines. For many years, it was used as 'a regular question' by a whole bunch of Connoisseurs, who generally cannot be considered as highly esteemed. A very hackneyed expression; should be used with caution.

Malolactic fermentation

Among Connoisseurs just known as malo. Describes a transformation of malic acid into lactic acid. A concrete and specific term, which is normally inapplicable for a true Connoisseur, but one can, however, claim that 'the malolactic fermentation has not gone off entirely appropiately'. No one will really be aware of the consequence of this.

Merde

An excellent exclamation that shows a Francophile background and suggests a classic wine culture, without having any concrete significance, neither positive nor negative.

Mhm

Signifies silent approval of the judgement by a famous or generally respected Connoisseur. Should be accompanied by a light bending of the neck.

Modern

Wonderful expression, which can be positive, negative, condescending or heartening at will. When using it as a description you may, if necessary, guard yourself (against those who might find the wine old-fashioned) by claiming that 'the intention is modern'.

N

Natural

Splendid expression about a wine you like. In contrast to unnatural (which no one is likely to use about a wine they approve of).

Nice

A value judgement. Should be avoided. Can be used at a pinch in muddled contexts such as: 'Nice that some people have the courage to go against the current and be mainstream.'

Note

A description of a concrete wine, which per definition is categoric and ultimative. A very important tool for a true Connoisseur: a note on a wine is authoritative and expresses the Truth about the wine. Should there be a discrepancy between one's own and other people's notes, it is not a sign of different perceptions of the wine, but shows the others' lack of professional, spiritual and moral competence.

Notes

You should always refrain from claiming that a wine tastes like this or that; a true Connoisseur points out that the wine has notes of this or that.

O

Old-fashioned

Wonderful expression, which can be positive, negative, condescending or heartening at will. When using it as a description you may, if necessary, guard yourself (against those who might find the wine modern) by claiming that 'the intention is old-fashioned'.

Oxidation

A term that describes the development and age of the wine and a lot of other things. Can be used as an expression of faults, flaws, maturation or production method. Very usable term in non-categoric statements. All wines are oxidated to some degree.

Oxidative

Quite airy technical term. The opposite of reductive. Very few will feel sure enough to deny that a wine may be oxidative.

Oxireductive

A professional term which to ordinary people verges on pure nonsense. Should only be used by the routined Connoisseur.

P

Phlegmatic

It is always nice to connect the character of the wine with a categorization of humans which only very few people are familiar with. See also:Choleric, Elegiac and Sanguine.

Pretentious

A way to bash an expensive wine, if you don't like it, or if you have judged it as insignificant. 'Sure it's a great and expensive wine, and it does in fact taste good, but I believe it has something rather pretentious to it.'

S

Sanguine

It is always nice to connect the character of the wine with a categorization of humans which only very few people are familiar with.See also: Choleric, Elegiac and Phlegmatic.

Strange

A word which, depending on the context, can express concern, displeasure, happiness or almost anything. Should - just in case - be accompanied by a light frown and an intense sniffing at the wine. (In that way it may signify, if nothing else, that it's strange that this wine tastes so good despite the producer, the vintage, the stage, the taste components or whatever).

Structure

A keystone in any wine. Usually relates to the acidity and tannin content of the wines, but there are no clearly delimited definitions. Can be used both positively and negatively and will always make an impression.

U

Unpretentious

A splendid expression to explain away the fact that you have praised a much too cheap wine (and Connoisseurs just don't do that!) 'Sure it's a small and simple wine, and it doesn't taste of anything special, but I just think it has something delightfully unpretentious about it'.

V

Vinous

A way to express that a wine is particularly wine-ish. Positive; but can hardly be considered as overclear speech.

Vintage

Can be incredibly crucial to the quality of a wine, and Connoisseurs traditionally spend a great deal of energy discussing it. A true Connoisseur should never be really happy about wines from less acknowledged vintages. As a precaution the Connoisseur's favourite vintages should be so old that no one else is likely to have ever tasted them: 1928 and 1929 are excellent - though not very original - possibilities.

onsdag den 22. juni 2011

Natural Wine – outlines of a definition

In fact I'm opposed to the idea of constructing a definition of natural wine. I believe that 'natural wine' is not in any way a conceptual idea with clear boundaries and definitions that include or exclude specific wines. Natural wine is not a concept really; it's just wine that is not manipulated too much. It's somewhat against the spirit of natural wines to propose a definition.

Furthermore the American Joe Dressner has already perpetrated a remarkable 14-point manifesto which cannot be surpassed in entertainment value or one-liners:

http://saignee.wordpress.com/2010/06/24/day-6-the-official-fourteen-point-manifesto-on-natural-wine/ .

You can also follow Cory Cartwright's two blog serials on the subject:

http://saignee.wordpress.com/31-days-of-natural-wine/

http://saignee.wordpress.com/2010/05/17/32-days-of-natural-wine/

The different postings are alternately entertaining, exciting, geeky and quite boring. But there's plenty of interesting reading.

Finally there's the Association des Vins Naturels, whose official charter can be found here: http://www.lesvinsnaturels.org/charte-signee-par-les-vignerons/ . Here you'll find specific instructions of what is allowed and what is not.

Nevertheless, when – despite all the reservations – I attempt to outline a definition, I do it because I hope to give an explanation of some of the intentions and ideas in the making of natural wines that goes beyond a specific set of rules. And perhaps initiate a debate that could be something else and more than a trench warfare for and against natural wines.

1. Natural wines are made from a wish of conveying an experience which has a concrete physical origin in an area or a vineyard.

It's the ambition that the wine shall tell a little story from out there; to one who's sensitive enough to listen. Wine can recount a place and a time bygone. Thus wine can be an experience that extends beyond the specific situation of 'man drinking wine'. Wine is first of all committed to taste good, but in happy cases the pleasure-oriented logic can be exceeded.

2. Natural wine is not goal-oriented and has no teleological approach. There's no desired direction, but a wide range of possibilities for succeeding.

First of all the wine must reflect the possibilities offered by the correlation between nature and the work with the vine and the wine. It is not necessarily made to please. That doesn't mean that one should drink all kinds of things that don't taste good, but a natural wine is only succesful if isn't forced in a specific direction. The winedrinker must always remain open and critical to whatever she pours down the drain. Furthermore, it is our concept of normality that decides what we perceive as succesful, and if one has lived a whole life with wines that are levelled off and predetermined in terms of taste, some natural wines can seem bizarre or even faulty.

3. Natural wine embraces a broad definition of what can be perceived as succesful.

In any case, wine is an acquired taste, and not all winedrinkers can embrace the same. Differences and diversity, however, must in this case - as in most cases - be considered an unconditional good. In practice it means that a lot of winedrinkers eventually change their perception of what wine is, and how it should and can taste. Natural wine demands a broad and spacious - but not uncritical! - definition of succesful wine.

4. Natural wine basically has to taste good and be nice to drink.

A lot of winemakers started to make natural wines, simply because they could drink more of it. In practice natural wine is always accompanied by a certain unrestrained hedonism and a great generosity. This is not a theoretical misrepresentation, but simply an empirical establishment(even though I shall refrain from declaring it statisticcaly significant, a quick survey showed a 100% approval, since all of the asked persons (my wife and myself, to be exact]) agreed totally with that conclusion).

5. Natural wine is basically grown without the use of chemical aids.

Wine must draw minerality and nutrition from the soil it grows in. In order for this to happen the soil must be full of flora and fauna. Soil work is a prerequisite for making natural wine, and the harvested grapes must be healthy and hold a vital yeast population. One chemical aid leads to the next as the natural balance of the plants and the soil is upset. Ideally the vineyard can be taken care of totally without the use of any chemicals. In practice, however, it is by no means all natural wines that are made totally without chemical aids, and sulphur and copper sulphate (also known as bordeaux mixture) are widely accepted preparations (and also allowed when making organic and biodynamic wine), but they are not desirable, and should be avoided as far as possible.

6. Natural wine is basically vinified without the use of cultured yeast, filtering, clarification, enzyme treatments or reversed osmosis. Sulphur is only employed in the lowest possible doses if at all.

Actually, large parts of the serious wine world will probably agree that they advocate as little intervention in the making of the wine as possible. However, there are big differences between the various forms of this (somewhat) reluctant interference and also between the degrees of tha actual reluctance. Maceration of white wines or long time maturing on the lees can produce notes which can make drinkers of conventional wines sneer. Filtering and clarification can make drinkers of natural wine shrug dispairingly and pour the wine straight out. The limits are fluid, and the answer is blowin' in the wine. Cultured yeast, enzymes and reversed osmosis, however, out of place in connection with natural wine.

7. A minimal addition of sulphur at the bottling is acceptable, but not desirable.

In recent years sulphur has been the great subject of discussion. Everybody agrees that too much sulphur is a fault; however, exactly when too much is too much, is a point of contention in many quarters]. The AVN lays down limit values for the contents of sulphur in wine that I can subscribe to, but I would like to stress that wines which keep respect these limits in my view can be too heavily sulphured, just as wines which do not respect/keep within these limits in some (rare) cases can comply with the definition of natural wine. The answer is in the wine.

8. Natural wines must be free and alive.

The fine thing about the natural wines is their life and twinkle. They must be free, unforced and uncontrolled. You cannot decide to make a wine that tastes like a 'natural wine'.

9. Natural wine doesn't have a static definition, but is an idea to pursue.

Of course it's not without problems to place the definition of natural wine outside the wine itself, but it's nevertheless the only way. There's no way to measure if a wine is natural or not. The answer is in the wine, but must be formulated by the winedrinker. The grapes don't harvest themselves and they don't crawl into the casks a year or so before the wine itself runs into the bottles. Wine is a cultural interaction between man and vineyard, exposed to wind and weather. There'll be a long row of borderline cases of wines where the definition 'natural' can and must be discussed, just as natural wines must be defined within a sliding scale of naturalness.

tirsdag den 17. maj 2011

Terres et Vins de Champagne 2011

Tasting of vins clairs and champagne from 18 of Champagnes striking winegrowers April 2011.
Narrated in pictures by Tue Juelsbo.

mandag den 11. april 2011

But would you drink this?

Wine production is responsible for about 50% of the pesticides used in France. Wine represents about 3% of the cultivated area. But never mind. Pesticides don't make it into wine, do they? Well..

In 2008 Pesticide Action Network (also known as PAN) purchased 34 bottles of conventionally farmed wine and had them analysed in a normal commercial lab. It was mainly wines from Europe, but all continents were represented; most of them were ordinary, cheap standard wines, but a few were expensive prestige wines with a retail price above € 200,-. Altogether 148 pesticide residues were found in the 34 bottles. All bottles contained at least one pesticide, on average the bottles contained more than four pesticides, the bottle that contained the most had residues from 10 different pesticides.

Luckily the EU has suggested limit values for residues of chemical products in wine. An exampel could be Folpel, which is an anti-rot preparation: 0,1 mg per liter has been suggested as a maximum limit value for residues in wine. 0,1 mg doesn't sound much, but compared with ordinary tap water, it turns out to be quite a lot. In water the limit value is 0,1 microgram per liter. 0,1 microgram is 0,0001 mg. Now we - or some of us at least - drink more water than wine, but still the maximum limits don't seem too reassuring.

By the way, Dear Reader, knows't thou what the following is:

  • Tébufénoside
  • Azoxystrobine
  • Diméthomorphe
  • Phtalimide
  • Denamidone metabolite
  • Cyprodinil
  • Fludioxonil
  • Fosforsyre
  • 3,5 DCA
  • Pyrimethanil
  • Thirame
  • Fenhexamide
  • Iprodione
  • Procymidone
  • Phtalimide
  • Quinalphos

Does't thou actually want to know?

Well. I thought not.

Drink natural wine!

torsdag den 3. februar 2011

Neuf Côtes de boeuf

Indkaldt til Concours de Côte-de-boeuf i Loire. Ni stks Côte de Boeuf fra hele Frankrig af forskellige kvægtyper, terroirs og slagtere. Ja, egentlig var der på forhånd tilmeldt ti og faktisk ankom vist nok kun otte, men overskriften - såvel som selve konkurrencen - får ligesom lidt mere svung med rim.

Aftenens vært: René.
Sted: St-Lambert-de-Lattay, Anjou, Loire, Frankrig.
Formål: At kåre verdens bedste Côte de boeuf. (Kun undertegnede kunne få øje på problematikken i at betragte det som et verdensmesterskab).
Deltagere: Ca. ni côte de boeuf.
Dommerpanel: 18 stks blandet landhandel med tilknytning til vin.
Tilbehør: En (1) skål salat, to kilo kartofler (SIC!), et ukendt antal flasker vin.

De indledende øvelser.
Stegt på pande, i ovn og på grill. Alt serveret blindt.
Og starten er gået.
Nummer 1:
Nummer 2:
(bemærk salaten)
Nummer 3:

Nummer 4:

Nummer 5:

Fra grill..

Nummer 6:

Nummer 7:
Tja. Bumbum.
Nummer 8:
Herefter er alt almindeligt kaos. Aftenen er fremskreden.
And now, the end is near..
Og vinderen er: tja. Det er lidt uvidst. Men der er returkamp næste år.